101 Reasons to Stop Writing

The Fundamentals of Our Publishing are Wrong

 
This Month's Demotivator:

Breaking News: Dan Brown, Doubleday to Publish Da Vinci Code 1.5

The Da Vinci Code 1.5 [Cover Image]
The revised cover for
The Da Vinci Code 1.5

New York — Author Dan Brown and Stephen Rubin, president and publisher of Doubleday, announced today that they would publish a fully revised version of the mega-selling 2003 novel The Da Vinci Code. The new edition, dubbed 1.5, would be "like re-reading the book for the first time," said Brown.

"The Da Vinci Code has been the publishing success story of the decade, second only to, well, you know who," said Rubin. "It’s sold more copies than we thought there were adults who still read books. But there were some minor errors in the original edition, little mistakes that slipped through the rigorous program of fact-checking that Dan did on his own work. So, now that the book’s been out there for five years, and the sales finally seemed to have dropped off, we felt this was the perfect time to bring out a revised edition, with absolutely bullet-proof historical detail. The Da Vinci Code 1.5 provides that and more, with some new characters, more chase sequences, and a completely revised conspiracy."

"It’s true that I let a few little mistakes go in the first edition," said Brown. "Factual errors about Biblical history, early Christianity and Judaism, Catholic theology, Egyptian mythology, Mithraism, the origins and language of the New Testament and Gnostic Gospels, the Nicene Council, Emperor Constantine, the Dead Sea Scrolls and Nag Hammadi texts, the history and modern organizational structure of Opus Dei, the history of the Vatican, interpretations of Leonardo’s Last Supper and Mona Lisa, Leonardo’s sexuality, the history of the Knights Templar, the history and architecture of Rosslyn Chapel and the Church of Saint-Sulpice, the history and geography of Paris, the location of Versailles, the position of Curator of the Louvre, the design of the Louvre Pyramid, the French education system, the French language, Andorra’s rail system and propensity for seismic activity, the geography of London and the procedures of the Metropolitan Police, the astronomical position of Venus, the feasibility of a button-sized GPS tracking device, the number of female victims of the Inquisition, the existence of a professorship of religious symbology at Harvard University, the existence of a scholarly discipline of religious symbology, the origin of the word ‘minstrel’, the ratio of male and female bees in a hive, the secret agenda of Disney films, the number of words in Job 38:11, the existence and supposed history of a Priory of Sion, the physical characteristics of people with albinism, to name a few — and, umm, the divinity of Jesus, and the notion that there is any historical evidence, at all, that Jesus had a sexual relationship with Mary Magdalene.

"These are all minor errors," said Brown, "but a few people have complained about them since the novel was first published. We’ve corrected a few errors over the years in different editions, but Doubleday and I felt it was time we had another bite at the apple, and release a new edition with enough changes that people would want to buy it again."

When asked if the revisions made substantive changes to the plot of the novel, Brown replied, "Oh sure. When you take out all the factual errors, baseless conjecture and flawed reasoning, the whole storyline basically collapses. All you’re left with is a guy who’s good at solving puzzles running around Europe for no reason. I don’t even like Europe. The new version is entirely set in Connecticut, so I could fact-check everything myself without having to drive more than two hours."

Doubleday president Rubin added, "I have personally verified every single fact in this new edition, which doesn’t reference anything that happened before 1985. It took most of a weekend."

"It’s still called The Da Vinci Code, though,"said Brown, "even though the only reference to Leonardo — Vinci is the town he was from, did you know that? I didn’t — is a print of the Mona Lisa in Robert Langdon’s bedroom. I know for a fact that he has a bedroom."

Brown refused to be drawn on the revised conspiracy plot of the new edition, saying only that "It involves aliens. Let’s see the bastards at Wikipedia disprove that."

The Da Vinci Code 1.5 goes on sale on April 31st, according to Brown.

 

11 Comments

  1. links from Technorati101 reasons to stop writing

  2. links from Technorati101 reasons to stop writing

  3. links from Technorati[IMG “It’s true that I let a few little mistakes go in the first edition,” said Brown. “Factual errors about Biblical history, early Christianity and Judaism, Catholic theology, Egyptian mythology, Mithraism, the origins and language

  4. links from TechnoratiHammadi texts, the history and modern organizational structure of Opus Dei, the history of the Vatican, interpretations of Leonardo’s Last Supper and Mona Lisa, Leonardo’s sexuality, the history of the Knights Templar ….” To read the rest go to<

  5. links from TechnoratiHammadi texts, the history and modern organizational structure of Opus Dei, the history of the Vatican, interpretations of Leonardo’s Last Supper and Mona Lisa, Leonardo’s sexuality, the history of the Knights Templar ….” To read the rest go to<

  6. Kramer auto Pingback[...] at the Petrona blog quotes the 101 reasons to stop writing blog, where she learns that: Dan Brown is to revise the Da Vinci Code to correct various minor and [...]

  7. [...] A fully revised edition of Dan Brown’s mega-bestseller is about to hit bookstores, “Now with no factual errors.“ “It’s true that I let a few little mistakes go in the first edition,” said [...]

  8. L:

    I don’t know which is worse, the fact that Dan Brown wrote the Da Vinci Code, the fact that it was made into a movie, the fact that people read said book and watched said movie, or the fact that someone, somewhere probably doesn’t realize this is satire.

    Although from what I’ve heard, you’ve only scratched the surface of the historical errors. ;P

  9. Kramer auto Pingback[...] Your page is on StumbleUpon [...]

  10. Well, perhaps he should also note that the ‘V’ in his books in the just the golden triangle, used in nearly all of Leonardo’s and Renaissance artists in general’s work for compositional purposes or the fact that the apostle which is supposedly Mary is always drawn femininely. And yes, I did know that Vinci was the name Leonardo’s home. “Da” means “of” Meaning Leonardo of Vinci. How could he make a book and not know these facts? Of course, I’m a bit biased, being an artist.

  11. Elmina:

    Well done, Mr Harris, very well written and very funny. Enjoyed it very much. Publication date is also clever. Took a break from writing mine to drink coffee and read this.

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Search 101 Reasons
Quotatery
Fine words! I wonder where you stole them.
Jonathan Swift
101 Reasons Progress
17 of 101 Reasons
Est. Completion Date:
September 11, 2029
Subscribe to 101 Reasons
Subscribe to get updates via RSS Feed:
Enter your email address to get updates via email (No spam):
powered by FeedBurner
Polls

What’s the longest you’ve waited for a response to a submission?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Bloggery Gadgetry
People Who Need to Stop Writing
powered by
101 Reasons to Stop Writing © 2006-8 Sean Lindsay. All rights reserved.
Any unauthorized or unattributed copying will brand you for life as a scumbag.
This site is not intended as a substitute for actual writing advice.
10 queries. 0.657 seconds.