"Songwriting is the spoiled, simpleminded cousin of poetry — which, let’s face it, is just overwritten prose without a plot."
There is a moment in the career of every writer where they realise, however dimly, that they have run out of ideas. Whether their Muse deserts them, their creative wellspring runs dry, they forget to run around the desk three times as part of their writing ritual, or they run out of dusty manuscripts from their dead grandfather’s chest to plagiarise, they find themselves suddenly and incomprehensibly unable to form an original, coherent idea.
Unfortunately far too few writers see this as the moment to stop, either by retiring, or the hard way. Many hope it’s just ‘writer’s block’, and that the block will give way if they throw enough angst at it. Some see it as a sign that their standards are set too high, and once they remove the word ‘original’ they’re able to carry on as if they never doubted themselves. Far too many, it seems, fail to recognise this moment when they experience it, because their standards never included the word ‘original’ in the first place.
There is no shame in admitting that you’ve run out of ideas. The shame comes when you try to charge people to discover for themselves you’ve run out of ideas.
As an illustrative example, I’m going to venture out of this blog’s typical focus on fiction writing, and examine another allegedly creative endeavour: the songwriting of Chad Kroeger of Nickelback.
Songwriting is the spoiled, simpleminded cousin of poetry — which, let’s face it, is just overwritten prose without a plot. Songwriting is to poetry, as letters to Penthouse are to literature. Songwriting is for people who need someone behind them playing drums to keep the meter while they recite. At its best, songwriting is beautiful, affecting poetry you can dance to. At its worst, its Simon-says-put-your-hands-in-the-air, for people too poorly coordinated to play air guitar.
If you’re lucky enough not to live in Canada, your first introduction to Nickelback was probably the bitter relationship power ballad "How You Remind Me", a monster hit from their breakout 2001 album Silver Side Up. If you like your power ballads to sound like one half of a phone breakup conversation overheard in a bar, this is a leading example of the form. The song was so successful for the band that they’ve taken to simply re-releasing it every three to six months, with a new name and modified lyrics, and very occasionally a modified melody.
The aching, monotonous sameness of here’s-your-nickel-back songs is perhaps best exemplified by this video, in which "How You Remind Me" is mixed with the band’s later single "Someday". As well as the blatant structural similarities in the songs, with verses, choruses and even the mezzo-piano bridges coinciding, singer Chad Kroeger’s hoarse delivery sounds the same whether he’s whispering or screaming.
The video’s creator did modify the timing of the original songs to match up more precisely.
Bassist Mike Kroeger (brother of Chad) defended the similarity with this sage opinion:
"I think that’s remarkable for someone to notice that there is a hit quality. If all hits sound the same, then sorry. When you are a band that has a distinct style such as us or AC/DC, that happens. When you have a distinct style, you run the risk of sounding similar." (Source)
Mike, there’s similar, then there’s Chuck Berry not being able to perform "School Days" and "No Particular Place to Go" in the same concert. There’s also a difference between having a ‘distinct style’ and music that is so unremarkable that you can only tell which song you’re listening to by the chorus.
They’ve made millions from selling the same album to the same fans who have exactly the same emotions, musical tastes, relationship problems and job in 2007 as they did in 2001."
To be fair, they have varied the theme over the years, swapping the broken-hearted whinefest for virtually every other cliché in rock: from the anthemic voicebox chorus of "Figured You Out", which celebrates the joys of sexually abusing an emotionally weak partner, to the hollow charity-starts-with-someone-else soft-rock ballad "If Everyone Cared" — which might’ve sounded sincere if it wasn’t preceded and then followed by the release and re-release of "Rockstar", a country-rock ode to how freaking awesome it is to be a rich musician — which itself might’ve sounded satirical if it wasn’t an accurate portrait of the band’s lifestyle, right down to the description of a "new tour bus full of old guitars". These songs would be obnoxious even if it was the first time we’d heard them — but every other group of half-caf venti mochachino college rockers has ripped the same pages out of the Aerosmith songbook.
Nickelback are frequently described as an "alt-rock" band, though with their singles on high rotation on FM stations worldwide, and some twenty-five million album sales, you have to wonder what they are an alternative to. An alternative to musical and creative integrity, perhaps. They’re also labelled "post-grunge", in the same unimaginative way that everything after Modernism is called "postmodernism". But they are "post-grunge" in the sense that they are a throw-the-nickel-back to the same over-produced, misogynistic stadium-rock hair metal that the grunge movement was reacting to. They’ve even been called "Metallica meets Nirvana", a ridiculous comparison taken together or separately, but it sounds cooler than "Goo Goo Dolls meets Matchbox Twenty".
Their appalling success proves, to anyone naïve enough not to already believe this, that you can get rich by finding something people like and selling it to them over and over. Yes, they’ve made millions from their brand of pseudo-earnest angst-rock, selling the same album to the same fans who have exactly the same emotions, musical tastes, relationship problems and job in 2007 as they did in 2001. But along the way, their name has become a synonym for formulaic, by-the-numbers, radio-friendly pop-rock unit-shifters, and they’ve overtaken the now-disbanded Creed to become the most widely-despised mainstream band since Hootie and the Blowfish.
Granted, it’s only been six years since their breakout hit (I’ll count that as Year Zero, rather than the go-nowhere earlier albums and their years spent playing grunge covers on the Canadian bar circuit), but lets compare that timeframe to the careers of other artists:
Chad Kroeger once said in an interview:
"I can play and sing anything I write really well, but I don’t consider myself to be great in either department." (Source)
This is actually a good litmus test: if you truly believe this about your own ability, you have no right to inflict your mediocrity onto a world that isn’t finished enjoying the great artists we already have. You’re just clogging the distribution channels with derivative rubbish, in the hope that it will find an open wallet attached to a mediocre mind, seeking reassurance that their life so far hasn’t been futile and empty by purchasing something new that sounds/looks/reads like everything they already own.
To return to fiction writing for a moment: it’s certainly possible to make a living as a writer producing a consistent stream of derivative rubbish — usually writing novels with Star- in the title. But with incredibly rare exception, it’s virtually impossible to get rich doing it — and by this I mean rockstar rich: new tour bus full of old typewriters, no brown M&Ms on the signing table, snorting coke off the naked asses of book tour groupies rich. Even the drummer from Nickelback who got fired in 2005 makes more money than you.

Hit it on the head, as usual, Sean. There’s a reason why I refer to the current SFWA debate as “more impotent whining than a Nickelback concert in Portland, Oregon.”
And talking about what a band could accomplish in five years or less, it’s time for a new Writing Demotivator. A quick picture of Sid Vicious and Nancy Spungen, reading “BAD BOY REPUTATION: A sufficiently obnoxious personality can sometimes overcome a complete lack of talent, but it usually doesn’t end well.”
Great post, Sean. I’d write something clever here…but I, too, have run out of ideas.
Peace,
- Dennis
http://www.donttipthewaiter.blogspot.com
Actually, when you just write the same thing over and over again, all you have to do is just become a bestselling romance author.
First off: Hooray, another reason! I was wondering if you had forgotten about the purpose of your blog
Secondly, great comparison. I, like Dennis, want to say something clever, but it’s early, I’m tired, and my coffee hasn’t kicked in yet.
Anyway, these guys are really just the ‘pulp’ of music, except with even fewer redeeming qualities. The only use they have is the music litmus test: If someone tells you that they have a band you have to hear, ask if they like Nickelback. If they do, you reject anything they ever have or will say about music, ever. Same goes for Dan Brown and books.
You’ve moved back your estimated completion date by two years! Congratulations!
@ MD - Dan Brown would make a good litmus test, but I find that James Patterson makes an even better one.
@ Austin - I would agree except that I think by this point everybody and their mother has developed an opinion on what Dan Brown has ‘written’ whereas I couldn’t pull the average schmuck off the street and drop that name without having to launch into an explanation. They’d need to hear something more concrete, and even then they’d probably say “Kiss the Girls? I never saw that movie. Wasn’t Morgan Freeman in it?”
Perhaps it’s a regional thing. Here in NYC, one in every three subway commuters will have their noses stuck in a Patterson book. A frightful thing if one considers that this city is one of the worldwide hubs for the publishing industry…
Oh, and speaking of whiner rock icons doing the same thing over and over, even after they’re dead, it’s no surprise that Tor found someone to finish up Robert Jordan’s Wheel of Time books. Boys and girls, can we say “Foo Fighters”?
Paul: Not only did they find someone to do the WoT books…
…he’s a NaNoWriMo author.
Heather:
Then he’s perfectly suited for the job. 400,000 to 500,000 words per book, and maybe a short story’s worth of ideas somewhere within the whole vowel movement.
@Austin - I wish I could speak more for how literate South Bay is, but as I went to college here, I have a very different perspective on it (I know two kinds of people: drunken frarority kids or engineers). But where I’m from, Orange County, I feel my statement would hold painfully true.
@Paul - Foo started off so promising. What the hell happened?
Paul and Heather:
Excellent! I look forward to seeing “Robert Jordan’s” new books at Half Priced Books soon.
Buying them from Half Priced Books would be another matter entirely, of course.
LOL @ Paul…”vowel movement” is as good as it gets!
Peace,
- Dennis
http://www.donttipthewaiter.blogspot.com
Did I just hear the necks of Anne Rice, Mercedes Lackey and Laurel K. Hamilton snap in unison from a collective blow upside the head?
Good one Sean! And don’t forget the corollary to #16: if you DO change what you’re doing (i.e. you grow as an artist, or just experiment with letting the characters in a series change over time), expect LOTS of complaining and whining from your audience.
As for Nickelback, this explains why I keep getting the lyrics of their latest hits on the radio mixed up in my head. Thank you.
Thanking you for articulating my hatred for Nickelback.
[...] Reason #16: You’re Doing the Same Damn Thing Over and Over There is a moment in the career of every writer where they realise, however dimly, that they have run out of ideas. Whether their Muse deserts them, their creative wellspring runs dry, they forget to run around the desk three times as part of their writing ritual, or they run out of dusty manuscripts from their dead grandfather’s chest to plagiarise, they find themselves suddenly and incomprehensibly unable to form an original, coherent idea. [...]
Another great member of the “Under Six Years to Success Club”, is Richie Valens, whose professional recording career lasted a whopping total of eight months; and he ended up with his own postage stamp.